→ Back to Home
Observability

Optimizing Log and AI Observability Search: Groundcover's Scalable Free-Text Approach

Groundcover, an observability platform, recently detailed their engineering journey in building a highly scalable free-text search capability for logs and AI observability data. The core challenge was enabling interactive search across datasets comprising hundreds of billions of log lines over extended periods (7-30 days), a scale where conventional indexing approaches become prohibitively expensive or slow. Their solution involved moving beyond simple ClickHouse indexes to a system that intelligently routes queries, employs different indexing strategies for various data shapes and time horizons, and specifically addresses the unique requirements of AI observability data. This development is significant because it directly addresses a critical pain point for DevOps and SRE teams: the ability to quickly and cost-effectively extract meaningful insights from ever-growing volumes of observability data. As systems become more distributed and complex, especially with the integration of AI components, the sheer volume of logs, metrics, and traces can overwhelm traditional search and analysis tools. Groundcover's approach demonstrates how to maintain interactive search performance and control costs, which is vital for rapid troubleshooting, root cause analysis, and proactive issue identification. It impacts any organization dealing with large-scale log data and those venturing into AI observability. The trend towards "observability at scale" has been a dominant theme in cloud-native and DevOps practices for years. With the rise of microservices, serverless, and now AI/ML workloads, the volume, velocity, and variety of operational data have exploded. Solutions like OpenTelemetry have standardized data collection, but the challenge has shifted to efficient storage, processing, and querying of this data. Companies are increasingly looking for ways to make all their data searchable without breaking the bank or sacrificing performance. This move by Groundcover aligns with the broader industry push towards AIOps and intelligent monitoring, where the ability to quickly query vast datasets is foundational for automated insights and anomaly detection. Other platforms like Datadog, Splunk, and Elastic have also invested heavily in scalable search capabilities, often leveraging distributed databases and advanced indexing techniques. Practitioners should recognize that "free-text search" at scale is not a trivial feature but a complex engineering problem requiring sophisticated solutions. When evaluating observability platforms, it's crucial to inquire about their underlying search architecture, indexing strategies, and how they manage cost-performance trade-offs for large datasets. For teams building their own observability stacks, Groundcover's experience highlights the need for careful consideration of database choices (e.g., ClickHouse), query optimization, and the potential for specialized indexes for different data types, particularly for AI observability data which often includes unstructured prompts and responses. This also suggests that a "one-size-fits-all" indexing approach is insufficient, and a nuanced strategy is required to achieve both interactive performance and cost efficiency.
#free-text search#log management#ai observability#scalability#clickhouse#ebpf
Read original source